|
|||||
|
Projects Ecotourism and Sustainable Development Letelier-Moffitt Human Rights Awards New Internationalism -- U.N. and the Middle East Social Action and Leadership School Sustainable Energy and Economy Network
IPS (202)
234-9382
Graphics adapted from work by Naul Ojeda. Click here to see more of his work.
|
Risks to Uranium Process WorkersOriginally published on the website of the British Medical Journal. In her review of the risks of depleted uranium to
occupational groups, Dr. Mc Diarmid concludes that "Fifty years'
study of occupational exposure provides little evidence of cancer."
Curiously, McDiarmid does not mention a special and very prominent review
of Department of Energy occupational epidemiological studies undertaken at
the request of the President in July 1999. (National Economic Council,
Interagency Working Group No. 1, January, 2000). This review made a
special effort to search out published and unpublished papers, which were
not readily available in the literature. Over the years, several important
papers sponsored by the DOE that reported significant risks associated
with workplace exposures at U.S. nuclear weapons sites were not published
and remained buried. The IOM study apparently could not perform the kind
of literature review relative to occupational epidemiologic studies of
uranium process workers that was done for the White House in early 2000.
Had they done so, perhaps they may have come to different conclusions. A careful review of the interagency report would have
revealed significant findings relative to uranium-exposed workers. For
instance: Oak Ridge Y-12 weapons Plant, Tennessee. Total
mortality was low as expected for this group, indicating a "healthy
worker effect." The study also found elevated death rates for brain
cancer, several lymphopoetic (immune system) cancers, as well as cancers
of the prostate, kidney and pancreas. Excess death from breast cancer
among women was found. The authors found excess lung cancer as their main
finding and urged that this disease warrants continued surveillance An
earlier study found similar risks, with a marginal dose-response trend for
lung cancer only. (Dana P. Loomis and Susanne H. Wolfe, Mortality of
Workers at a Nuclear Materials Production Plant at Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
1947-1990, American Journal of Medicine, 1996, 29:131-141,Harvey Checkoway,
Neil Pierce, Douglas J. Crawford-Brown, and Donna Cragle, Radiation Doses
and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Workers at a Nuclear Materials
Fabrication Plant, American Journal of Epidemiology, 1998,127:2:255-266.) The K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Tennessee. Excess risks of dying from all causes were found for white males when compared to general population rates. Other statistically significant increases among white males were for cancers of the respiratory system, bone cancer, mental disorders and all respiratory diseases including pneumonia. Generally the excess deaths from diseases among females were similar to males. Upon further analysis, increased risks of dying from kidney cancer and chronic nephritis (kidney disease) were found. The latter condition was more than 600 percent higher when deaths from the last decade of follow up was
observed.(Elizabeth A. Dupree, Susan M. Wells, Janice P. Watkins, Phillip
W. Wallace, Nancy C. Davis, Mortality Among Workers Employed between 1945
and 1984 at a Uranium Gaseous Diffusion Facility, Draft Report, Oak Ridge
Institute for Science and Education. (no date)). Fernald Uranium Processing Plant, Ohio. Significant
increased risks of dying from stomach cancer were found among salaried
workers (261 percent higher than expected). For hourly workers
statistically significant increased death risks were found for all cancers
(21 percent higher) and lung cancer (26 percent higher). The authors
concluded that there is evidence of a radiation-dose relationship for both
nonmalignant respiratory diseases and lung cancer. (Donna L. Cragle,
Janice P. Watkins, J. Nicholas Ingle, Kathryn Robertson-Demers, William
G.Tankersley, Charles M. West, Mortality Among a Cohort of White Male
Workers at a Uranium Processing Plant: Fernald Feed Materials Production
Center [FMPC], Oak Ridge Associated Universities.) Linde Air Products Co., NY. Statistically significant
increased risks of dying from all causes (18 percent higher), laryngeal
cancer (447 percent higher), all circulatory diseases (18 percent higher),
arteriosclerotic heart disease (19 percent higher), all respiratory
diseases (52 percent higher) and pneumonia (217 percent higher) were found
among workers who processed uranium at this facility between 1943 and
1949. (Elizabeth A. DuPree, Donna Cragle, Richard, W. McLain, Douglas
Crawford-Brown, M. Jane Teta, Mortality among workers at a uranium
processing facility, the Linde Air Products Company Ceramics Plant, 1943-
49, Scandinavian Journal of Worker and Environmental Health, 1987, 13:100-
107.) Mallinkrodt Chemical Works, Missouri. Workers who
processed uranium between 1942 and 1966 were found to have a significant
increased death rate from all cancers (10 percent higher). Respiratory
diseases, chronic nephritis/kidney disease (218 percent higher) and
lymphatic cancers were significantly elevated. In particular, significant
increased risks were found for cancers of the esophagus(40 percent
higher), rectum (45 percent higher), pancreas (31 percent higher), larynx
(36 percent higher) kidney (34 percent higher) and multiple myeloma/bone
marrow (33 percent higher). Kidney cancer showed a significant positive
dose-response association with external radiation. (E. DuPree Ellis, J.P.
Watkins, J.N. Ingle, J.A. Phillips, External Radiation Exposure and
Mortality Among a Cohort of Uranium Processing Workers, Oak Ridge
Associated Universities, Oak Ridge TN, (unpublished report). It is remarkable that this White House review was not
mentioned by McDiarmid since it received widespread attention. It prompted
the Department of Energy to officially concede on January 29, 2000 that
it's nuclear weapons workers were placed at risk of increased disease and
death. This Presidential review also served as an underpinning for the
recent creation of a major worker compensation entitlement program by the
U.S. Congress -- which specifically grants a non-rebuttable presumption
for 22 listed cancers to uranium process workers exposed to recycled
uranium, contaminated with isotopes such as plutonium-239, neptunium-237,
and Technetium 99, which now are being found in depleted uranium on the
battlefields of the Balkans and the Persian Gulf.
|
||||